Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.
Skip to main content

Table 4 Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for perceived lack of safety to access the toilet (MLR model 1), by city

From: Environmental determinants of access to shared sanitation in informal settlements: a cross-sectional study in Abidjan and Nairobi

Exposure

Respondents in Abidjan (n = 2451)

Respondents in Nairobi (n = 9481)

aOR

Lower CI (95%)

Upper CI (95%)

Significance

aOR

Lower CI (95%)

Upper CI (95%)

Significance

Toilet shared by more than one household

1.58

0.61

4.13

Not significant

5.06e7

0.00

inf

Not significant

Household’s head with secondary education

0.54

0.27

1.09

*2

0.81

0.52

1.27

Not significant

Female respondent

1.62

0.88

3.16

Not significant

1.25

0.80

1.96

Not significant

Toilet located out of premises

3.14

1.13

8.70

**2

57.97

35.93

93.53

****2

  1. Bold: statistically significant variables
  2. 1Corresponds to the number of household surveys having valid answers to all five variables included in the model
  3. 2The number of * indicates the significance of each beta coefficient resulting from the multiple logistic regression (MLR) which corresponds to the probability of the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) being equal to 1: *P value < 0.1, **P value < 0.05, ***P value < 0.01, ****P value < 0.001. CI Confidence interval
Back to article page

Infectious Diseases of Poverty

ISSN: 2049-9957

Contact us